THOMAS ET AL.

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Gary L. "Scott" Dickey, 736 F.2d 571 (10th Cir. 1984)
  …is. THE COURT: Objection sustained. R. , Vol. XXIV at 49-50. We have often held that the trial court has broad discretion to limit the scope of cross-examination. See, e.g., United States v. Haro, 573 F. 2d 661, 667 (10th Cir.1978), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 851, 99 S.Ct. 156, 58 L.Ed.2d 155 (1978); Foster v. United States, 282 F. 2d 222, 224 (10th Cir.1960). It is clear from the record that counsel for Adams had ample opportunity to impeach Ruth Bragg through recall or cross-examination of her. It was impr…
• Mata v. Sumner, 611 F.2d 754 (9th Cir. 1979)
  …ility of an in-court identification. See, e. g., United States v. Valdivia, 492 F. 2d 199, 210 (9th Cir. 1973), cert. denied, 416 U.S. 940, 94 S.Ct. 1945, 40 L.Ed.2d 292 (1974); United States v. Crawford, 576 F. 2d 794, 797 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 851, 99 S.Ct. 157, 58 L.Ed.2d 155 (1978). First, the necessity of the photographic identification procedure is considered. Id. In this ease, appellant was an inmate at the Tehachapi facility and was placed in segregation after the stabbing. It seems qui…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• United States v. Moore, 616 F.2d 1030 (7th Cir. 1980)
  …ng aside only the possession conviction. Other circuits faced with the issue before us have done likewise. United States v. DiGeronimo, 598 F. 2d 746, 752-53 (2d Cir. 1979); United States v. Crawford, 576 F. 2d 794, 800-01 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 851, 99 S.Ct. 157, 58 L.Ed.2d 155 (1978); cf. Gentry v. United States, 533 F. 2d 998, 999-1000 (6th Cir. 1976) (distinguishing Milanovich on the ground that no evidence of the [*1034] receipt of proceeds of the robbery was presented). Like the other ci…