SHEPHERD

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (65 total)

• United States v. Shackleford, 738 F.2d 776 (7th Cir. 1984)
  …stimony played no part in the jury’s verdict.” We cannot agree. Our task is to gauge “what effect the error had or reasonably may be taken to have had upon the jury’s decision.” United States v. Shepherd, 576 F. 2d 719, 723 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 852, 99 S.Ct. 158, 58 L.Ed.2d 155 (1978) (quoting Kotteakos v. United States, 328 U.S. 750, 764, 66 S.Ct. 1239, 1247, 90 L.Ed. 1557 (1946)). Only if “we are convinced that ‘the error did not influence the jury, or had but very slight effect,’ and can…
• United States v. Winter, 663 F.2d 1120 (1st Cir. 1981)
  …ely to result from a joint trial”; the denial of such a motion may be overturned only if an abuse of discretion is shown. United States v. Thomann, 609 F. 2d 560, 564 (1st Cir. 1979); United States v. Luna, 585 F. 2d 1, 4-5 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 852, 99 S.Ct. 160, 58 L.Ed.2d 157 (1978). Neither the fact that Price’s and Goldenberg’s involvement in the scheme was not as extensive as that of Winter and Martorano nor their claims that they would be prejudiced by vast amounts of testimony pertinent…
• United States v. Vinson, 606 F.2d 149 (6th Cir. 1979)
  …en banc court, 590 F. 2d 575 (1979). . See the majority and concurring opinions in the Fifth Circuit’s en banc decision in United States v. James, 590 F. 2d 575 (1979). . United States v. Macklin, 573 F. 2d 1046, 1049 n. 3 (8th Cir.), cert. denied 439 U.S. 852, 99 S.Ct. 160, 58 L.Ed.2d 157 (1978). . United States v. James, 590 F. 2d at 581-83; United States v. Bell, 573 F. 2d 1040, 1044 (8th Cir. 1978); United States v. Geaney, 417 F. 2d 1116, 1120 (2d Cir. 1969), cert. denied 397 U.S. 1028, 90 S.Ct. 127…