MICHELE

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (22 total)

• McCAA v. State, 562 So. 2d 382 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990)
  …e v. Klimczak, 159 Conn. 608, 268 A. 2d 372 (1970). The state responds with examples of its own of what are described as “ambiguous exercises of the right to remain silent.” For example, in Reeves v. State, 241 Ga. 44, 243 S.E. 2d 24, cert. denied, 439 U.S. 854, 99 S.Ct. 165, 58 L.Ed.2d 160 (1978), the court found a suspect’s declaration, “I ain’t saying nothing,” was, when viewed in context, “plainly not an attempt to cut off questioning.” Although the state concedes that MpCaa’s statement was “seemingly…
• United States v. Winter, 663 F.2d 1120 (1st Cir. 1981)
  …im, such considerations are relevant when there is a reasonable assurance that the defendants will receive a fair trial if not severed. United States v. Boscia, 573 F. 2d 827, 833 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 436 U.S. 911, 98 S.Ct. 2248, 56 L.Ed.2d 411, 439 U.S. 854, 99 S.Ct. 165, 58 L.Ed.2d 160 (1978). Appellants received such a trial here. Nor do we' think that the trial judge improperly denied Price’s and Goldenberg’s motions for transfer under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 21.50 Turning [*1150] first…
• United States v. Jefferson, 925 F.2d 1242 (10th Cir. 1991)
  …ed.R.Evid. 609(b).16 We will reverse the district court’s decision to allow the government to introduce the convictions into evidence only if we find an abuse of discretion. See United States v. Lamb, 575 F. 2d 1310, 1314 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 854, 99 S.Ct. 165, 58 L.Ed.2d 160 (1978) (applying the abuse of discretion standard when reviewing a district court’s Rule 609(a)(1) ruling). The government argues that even if the ten year period had run, “since it is so close and since aggravated robb…