LUGO

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (29 total)

• United States v. Spiegel, 604 F.2d 961 (5th Cir. 1979)
  …us for mandamus on the ground that the trial court lacked jurisdiction to impose sentence. We denied his petition, In re Stanley Spie-gel, No. 78-1764 (5th Cir., June 6, 1978) (unpublished), and the Supreme Court denied certiorari. Spiegel v. Moye, 439 U.S. 861, 99 S.Ct. 181, 58 L.Ed.2d 170 (1978). Appellants’ alternate contention based on abuse of discretion and violation of the right to a speedy trial fares no better. As we state above, the trial court acted within its discretion; the govem [*972] ment’…
• Steaks Unlimited, Inc. v. Deaner, 623 F.2d 264 (3d Cir. 1980)
  …g. Co., Inc., 313 U.S. 487, 496, 61 S.Ct. 1020, 1021, 85 L.Ed. 1477 (1941); Erie R. R. v. Tompkins, 304 U.S. 64, 58 S.Ct. 817, 82 L.Ed. 1188 (1938). . See Pierce v. Capital Cities Communications, Inc., 576 F. 2d 495, 501-02 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 861, 99 S.Ct. 181, 58 L.Ed.2d 170 (1978). Cf: Home Ins. Co. v. Dick, 281 U.S. 397, 50 S.Ct. 338, 74 L.Ed. 926 (1930) (application of Texas statute imposing longer statute of limitations to contractual claim than terms of contract provided held to violat…

  ← 1 / 4 →
• Tavoulareas v. Piro, 817 F.2d 762 (D.C. Cir. 1987)
  …law that “words must be read in the context of the entire communication as a whole.” R. Sack, Libel, Slander, and Related Problems 52 (1980) (emphasis added). See Pierce v. Capital Cities Communications, 576 F. 2d 495, 502 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 861, 99 S.Ct. 181, 58 L.Ed.2d 170 (1978) (“a court should not scrutinize simply the literal references of the language in question, but also should weigh the words ‘together with their context,’ Restatement, Second, Torts § 563, Comment (d)”); Curtis Pu…