SAYLES

v.

SALES

Citator

Cited By (63 total)

• United States v. Kopituk, 690 F.2d 1289 (11th Cir. 1982)
  …rinsic offenses as may be probative of a defendant’s state of mind is admissible unless he ‘affirmatively take[s] the issue of intent out of the case.’ 619 F. 2d at 383, quoting United States v. Williams, 577 F. 2d 188, 191 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 868, 99 S.Ct. 196, 58 L.Ed.2d 179 (1978); accord, United States v. [*1335] Bulman, supra, 667 F. 2d at 1382; United States v. Renteria, 625 F. 2d 1279, 1282 (5th Cir. 1980). The decision in Roberts was based upon the unique difficulty of proving intent…
• Quinn v. Syracuse Model Neighborhood Corp., 613 F.2d 438 (2d Cir. 1980)
  …976). Thus, the mere possibility that a factual dispute may exist, without more, is not sufficient to overcome a convincing presentation by the moving party. See Gatling v. Atlantic Richfield Co., 577 F. 2d 185, 187-88 (2d Cir. 1978), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 868, 99 S.Ct. 181, 58 L.Ed.2d 169 (1979). The litigant opposing summary judgment, therefore, “may not rest upon mere conclusory allegations or denials” as a vehicle for obtaining a trial. SEC v. Research Automation Corp., 585 F. 2d 31, 33 (2d Cir. 1978)…
• United States v. Figueroa, 618 F.2d 934 (2d Cir. 1980)
  …pears to have satisfied Judge Platt, who then discussed with counsel and ultimately relied upon the theory that Acosta was challenging the nature of the substance in the bag. In United States v. Williams, 577 F. 2d 188, 192 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 868, 99 S.Ct. 196, 58 L.Ed.2d 179 (1978), this Court ruled that a prior conviction was properly admitted on the issue of intent where counsel had argued that the defendant had not attended a crucial meeting and that, even if he had been present, his att…

  ← 1 / 2 →