VILLARREAL

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (12 total)

• United States v. Hendricks, 743 F.2d 653 (9th Cir. 1984)
  …mportant judicial function — the determination that probable cause exists to believe that the objects are currently in the place to be searched. The cases cited by the Government, e.g., United States v. Lowe, 575 F. 2d 1193 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 869, 99 S.Ct. 198, 58 L.Ed.2d 180 (1978); United States ex rel. Beal v. Skaff, 418 F. 2d 430 (7th Cir.1969), are, as defendant notes, controlled delivery cases. As in Goff, if the government knows that the person or object will be at a particular place…
• McCALL-BEY v. Franzen, 777 F.2d 1178 (7th Cir. 1985)
  …. 409, 410 (W.D.Okla.1979); Dependahl v. Falstaff Brewing, 448 F.Supp. 813, 815 (E.D.Mo.1978); Gliniecki v. Borden, 444 F.Supp. 619, 622 (E.D.Wisc.1978); Read v. Baker, 438 F.Supp. 737, 741 (D.Del.1977), aff’d, 577 F. 2d 728 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 869, 99 S.Ct. 197, 58 L.Ed.2d 180 (1978); Reid v. Graybeal, 437 F.Supp. 24, 27 (W.D.Okla.1977).12 In Fairfax Countywide Citizens Ass’n v. County of Fairfax, 571 F. 2d 1299 (4th Cir.1978), the plaintiffs sought to reopen their case more than three years…
• United States v. Garcia, 882 F.2d 699 (2d Cir. 1989)
  …“presently located at the place described in the warrant” is immaterial, so long as “there is probable cause to believe that it will be there when the search warrant is executed.” United States v. Lowe, 575 F. 2d 1193, 1194 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 869, 99 S.Ct. 198, 58 L.Ed.2d 180 (1978); see United States v. Dornhofer, 859 F. 2d 1195, 1198 (4th Cir.1988), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 109 S.Ct. 1639, 104 L.Ed.2d 155 (1989). Nor should it be otherwise, for even a warrant based on a known presence of con…

  ← 1 / 2 →