WASHINGTON ET AL.

v.

UNITED STATES ET AL.; AND PUGET SOUND GILLNETTERS ASSN. ET AL. V. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON (UNITED STATES ET AL., REAL PARTIES IN INTEREST)

Citator

Cited By

• Brown v. Texas, 443 U.S. 47 (U.S. 1979)
  …3 (Vernon 1977). Accordingly, the County Courtis rejection of appellant's constitutional claims was a decision “by the highest court of a State in which a decision could be had.” 28 U. S. C. § 1257 (2). On appeal here we noted probable jurisdiction. 439 U. S. 909 (1978). We reverse. II When the officers detained appellant for the purpose of requiring him to identify himself, they performed a seizure of his person subject to the requirements of the Fourth Amendment. In convicting appellant, the County Court…
• Washington v. Wash. State Commercial Passenger Fishing Vessel Ass'n, 443 U.S. 658 (U.S. 1979)
  …deral courts regarding what, if any, right the Indians have to a share of the fish, to address the implications of international regulation of the fisheries in the area, and to remove any doubts about the federal court’s power to enforce its orders. 439 U. S. 909. IV The treaties secure a “right of taking fish.” The pertinent articles provide: “The right of taking fish, at all usual and accustomed grounds and stations, is further secured to said Indians, in common with all citizens of the Territory, and o…
• Sauers v. Alaska Barge & Transp., Inc., 600 F.2d 238 (9th Cir. 1979)
  …umstances the court properly may consider the pleadings and pretrial order to have been amended to conform to the evidence presented. See Puget Sound Gillnetters Assoc, v. United States District Court, 573 F. 2d 1123, 1131 (9th Cir.), cert. granted, 439 U.S. 909, 99 S.Ct. 277, 58 L.Ed.2d 255 (1978) (Rule 15(b) Fed.R.Civ.P. standards applicable to modification of pleadings or pretrial order to conform to evidence presented); Dering v. Williams, 378 F. 2d 417, 419 (9th Cir. 1967); American Pipe & Steel Corp.…