GOLDSMITH

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (76 total)

• State v. Cantrell, 426 So. 2d 1035 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983)
  …than that of the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution. Hetland v. State, 387 So. 2d 963 (Fla.1980), affirming State v. Hetland, 366 So. 2d 831 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979). .United States v. Reed, 572 F. 2d 412, 423 (2d Cir.1978), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 913, 99 S.Ct. 283, 58 L.Ed.2d 259 (1978).…
• State v. YEE, 177 So. 3d 72 (Fla. 3d DCA 2015)
  …t least in the absence of exigent circumstances, even when it is accomplished under statutory authority and when probable cause is clearly present.” United States v. Reed, 572 F. 2d 412, 423 (1978), cert. denied, sub nom. Goldsmith v. United States, 439 U.S. 913, 99 S.Ct. 283, 58 L.Ed.2d 259. We find this reasoning to be persuasive and in accord with this Court’s Fourth Amendment decisions. Payton, 445 U.S. at 587-89, 100 S.Ct. 1371. The Payton Court concluded that “the Fourth Amendment has drawn a firm…
• State v. Bernardo Lopez, 590 So. 2d 1045 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991)
  …exigent circumstances, even when it is accomplished under statutory authority and when probable cause is clearly present. Payton v. New York, 445 U.S. at 573, 100 S.Ct. at 1373 (quoting United States v. Reed, 572 F. 2d 412 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 913, 99 S.Ct. 283, 58 L.Ed.2d 259 (1978)). After Payton, clearly all non-consensual entries for the purposes of arrest were per se unreasonable under a Fourth Amendment analysis. Payton, 445 U.S. at 574, 100 S.Ct. at 1373. The bright line rule in Payto…