AVERY FEDERAL SAVINGS & LOAN ASSN. ET AL.
v.
MEYERS ET AL., COMMISSIONERS, SINKING FUND OF THE CITY OF LOUISVILLE
AVERY FEDERAL SAVINGS & LOAN ASSN. ET AL.
MEYERS ET AL., COMMISSIONERS, SINKING FUND OF THE CITY OF LOUISVILLE
439 U.S. 921
Supreme Court of the United States (1978)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
State v. Tsavaris, 394 So. 2d 418 (Fla. 1981)…ed person to bring the materials sought at a time and place described in the subpoena. See Stanford Daily v. Zurcher, 353 F.Supp. 124 (N.D.Cal.1972); Hynes v. Moscowitz, 44 N.Y.2d 383, 406 N.Y.S.2d 1, 377 N.E. 2d 446 (Ct.App.1978), appeal dismissed, 439 U.S. 921, 99 S.Ct. 302, 58 L.Ed.2d 315 (1978). In summary, we hold that Dr. Feegel’s recording of Tsavaris’s conversation with him was an unlawful interception of a wire or oral communication within the meaning of chapter 934. Further, we hold that the subp…
-
Robinson v. Dep't OF Pub. Utils., 835 F.2d 19 (1st Cir. 1987)…discretion to limit intervention. See, e.g., Attorney General v. Department of Public Utilities, 390 Mass. 208, 216-17, 455 N.E. 2d 414 (1983); Boston Edison Company v. Department of Public Utilities, 375 Mass. 1, 45, 375 N.E. 2d 305, cert. denied, 439 U.S. 921, 99 S.Ct. 301, 58 L.Ed.2d 314 (1978); City of Newton v. Department of Public Utilities, 339 Mass. 535, 543 n. 1 (1959). This discretion “was obviously intended to permit the department to control the extent of participation by persons not sufficient…