FARE, ACTING CHIEF PROBATION OFFICER

v.

MICHAEL C.

Citator

Cited By

• Davis v. Passman, 442 U.S. 228 (U.S. 1979)
  …the Constitution when.the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment is violated. The Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, en banc, concluded that “no civil action for damages” can be thus implied. 571 F. 2d 793, 801 (1978). We granted certiorari, 439 U. S. 925 (1978), and we now reverse. I At the time this case commenced, respondent Otto E. Passman was a United States Congressman from the Fifth Congressional District of Louisiana.1 On February 1, 1974, Passman hired petitioner Shirley Davis as a deputy…
• Oscar Mayer & Co. v. Evans, 441 U.S. 750 (U.S. 1979)
  …yment and that § 14 (b) required resort to this state remedy prior to the commencement of the federal suit. The District Court denied the motion, and the Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit affirmed.1 580 F. 2d 298 (1978). We granted certiorari, 439 U. S. 925 (1978). We reverse. II Petitioners argue that § 14 (b) mandates that in States with agencies empowered to remedy age discrimination in employment (deferral States) a grievant may not bring suit [*755] under the ADEA unless he has first commenced a…
• Moore v. Sims et ux., 442 U.S. 415 (U.S. 1979)
  …es in the Texas state courts in 1976. The state proceedings, however, were enjoined by the three-judge District Court below, which went on to find various parts of Title 2 unconstitutional on their face or as applied. We noted probable jurisdiction. 439 U. S. 925 (1978). This appeal first raises the question whether in light of the pending state proceedings, the Federal District Court should have exercised its jurisdiction. We conclude that it should not have done so and accordingly reverse and remand with i…