RANQUIST

v.

DIRECTOR, DEPARTMENT OF REGISTRATION AND EDUCATION OF ILLINOIS, ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• State v. Emiliano Mejia, 579 So. 2d 766 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991)
  …ch. E.g., Lockhart v. McCotter, 782 F. 2d 1275 (5th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1030, 107 S.Ct. 873, 93 L.Ed.2d 827 (1987); United States v. Lester, 647 F. 2d 869 (8th Cir.1981); United States v. Oaxaca, 569 F. 2d 518 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 926, 99 S.Ct. 310, 58 L.Ed.2d 319 (1978).2 [*768] In this case the police did no more at the later search than they were legally entitled to do at the time of the arrest.3 That the full evidentiary value of the paper in question was not revealed until a…
• United States v. Ramapuram, 632 F.2d 1149 (4th Cir. 1980)
  …rt granted the requested transfer and the trial on the subsequent indictment is that from which this appeal was noted. See United States v. Ramapuram, 432 F.Supp. 140 (D.Md. 1977), aff’d, 577 F. 2d 738 (4th Cir.) (unpublished opinion), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 926, 99 S.Ct. 309, 58 L.Ed.2d 318 (1978). Ramapuram’s jurisdictional attack on his conviction is founded on the alleged impropriety and inadequacy of the § 5032 transfer certification and on the then-pending appellate proceedings arising therefrom. It…
• United States v. Browne, 829 F.2d 760 (9th Cir. 1987)
  …prior “bank robbery conviction [is] not inadmissible per se, merely because the offense involved was identical to that for which [the defendant] was on trial.” United States v. Oaxaca, 569 F. 2d 518, 527 (9th Cir.) (emphasis deleted), cert, denied, 439 U.S. 926, 99 S.Ct. 310, 58 L.Ed.2d 319 (1978). If a prior bank robbery conviction serves a proper impeachment purpose, it, like evidence of other crimes, may be admissible in spite of its similarity to the offense at issue. Id. Based on the importance of th…