CLARK

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (29 total)

• United States v. Phillips, 664 F.2d 971 (5th Cir. 1981)
  …inster and Grant. Both rely in large part on Jeffers v. United States, 432 U.S. 137, 97 S.Ct. 2207, 53 L.Ed.2d 168 (1977); United States v. Ruigomez, 576 F. 2d 1149 (5th Cir. 1978); and United States v. Smith, 574 F. 2d 308 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 931, 99 S.Ct. 321, 58 L.Ed.2d 325 (1978), subsequent appeal sub nom. United States v. Stratton, 649 F. 2d 1066 (5th Cir. 1981). The double jeopardy clause protects against a second prosecution for the same offense after acquittal, against a second pros…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• United States v. Anderson, 626 F.2d 1358 (8th Cir. 1980)
  …to prove the predicate crimes.17 See United States v. Solano, 605 [*1368] F. 2d 1141, 1143-45 (9th Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1020, 100 S.Ct. 677, 62 L.Ed.2d 652 (1980); United States v. Smith, 574 F. 2d 308, 310-11 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 931, 99 S.Ct. 321, 58 L.Ed.2d 325 (1978). The definition of “pattern of racketeering activity” can aid construction of the term “enterprise” by examining the nature of the types of offenses chosen by Congress to be listed as “racketeering activity.” Th…
• Perry v. Leeke, 488 U.S. 272 (U.S. 1989)
  …should avoid circumvention of rule by “making it clear that witnesses are not only excluded from the courtroom but also that they are not to relate to other witnesses what their testimony has been and what occurred in the courtroom”), cert. denied, 439 U. S. 931 (1978); Milanovich v. United States, 275 F. 2d 716, 720 (CA4 1960) (“[0]r-dinarily, when a judge exercises his discretion to exclude witnesses from the courtroom, it would seem proper for him to take the further step of making the exclusion effectiv…