ORECK CORP.

v.

WHIRLPOOL CORP. ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (36 total)

• Parts Depot Co., L.P. v. Fla. Auto Supply, Inc., 669 So. 2d 321 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996)
  …at the net economic effect of its removal from the “overnight delivery of auto parts” market had on the availability or price of overnight delivery in Vero Beach. See, e.g., Oreck Corp. v. Whirlpool Corp., 579 F. 2d 126, 128 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 946, 99 S.Ct. 340, 58 L.Ed.2d 338 (1978). Instead, it showed what [*326] effect Parts Depot’s refusal to sell to Florida Auto Supply had on its financial picture. That is not sufficient. Antitrust laws are for the protection of competition, not for the…
• Sherman v. British Leyland Motors, Ltd., 601 F.2d 429 (9th Cir. 1979)
  …88 U.S. 365, 87 S.Ct. 1856, 18 L.Ed.2d 1249] — upon for-' malistic line drawing. Continental T.V., Inc. v. GTE Sylvania, Inc., 433 U.S. at 58-59, 97 S.Ct. at 2562. In Oreck Corp. v. Whirlpool Corp., 579 F. 2d 126 (2d Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 946, 99 S.Ct. 340, 58 L.Ed.2d 338 (1978), the majority held because of the vertical nature of the restraint that the rule of reason applied, while Judge Mansfield, dissenting, considered the per se rule to have been invoked because of involvements of a…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Aladdin OIL Co. v. Texaco, Inc., 603 F.2d 1107 (5th Cir. 1979)
  …2d 111, 113 (5th Cir. 1979) (quot [*1117] ing Continental T.V., Inc. v. GTE Sylvania Inc., 433 U.S. 36, 53 n. 19, 97 S.Ct. 2549, 53 L.Ed.2d 568 (1977)). See also Oreck Corp. v. Whirlpool Corp., 579 F. 2d 126, 133 (2d Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 946, 99 S.Ct. 340, 58 L.Ed.2d 338 (1978); Northwest Power Products, Inc. v. Omark Industries, 576 F. 2d 83, 87 (5th Cir. 1978); Dillon Materials Handling Inc. v. Albion Industries, 567 F. 2d 1299 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 832, 99 S.Ct. 111, 58…

  ← 1 / 2 →