JOHN J. HAGAN AND MAE HAGAN, HIS WIFE, APPELLANTS,
v.
DADE COUNTY, A POLITICAL SUBDIVISION OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
JOHN J. HAGAN AND MAE HAGAN, HIS WIFE, APPELLANTS,
DADE COUNTY, A POLITICAL SUBDIVISION OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
207 So. 2d 79
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1968)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
Affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Clement v. Aztec Sales, Inc., 297 So. 2d 1 (Fla. 1974)…s set out below. We have carefully considered this case, together with other case authority construing Fla.Stat. § 59.04, F.S.A., including Marley v. Saunders, 249 So. 2d 30 (Fla.1971); Seigel v. Solomon, 201 So. 2d 501 (Fla.App.3d, 1967), affirmed 207 So. 2d 79; and Means v. Douglas, 110 So. 2d 88 (Fla.App.1st, 1959). This Court has approved the holding that an order granting a new trial is a substantive right given by Fla.Stat. § 59.04, F.S.A., and is not interlocutory in nature. Seigel v. Solomon, supra.…