BULLOCK ET AL.

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (37 total)

• United States v. Williams, 604 F.2d 1102 (8th Cir. 1979)
  …investigation. Rule 615 of the Federal Rules of Evidence does not authorize the exclusion of a government officer or employee who has been designated as its representative. E. g., United States v. Boyer, 574 F. 2d 951, 955 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 967, 99 S.Ct. 457, 58 L.Ed.2d 426 (1978); United States v. Maestas, 523 F. 2d 316, 321 (10th Cir. 1975). Further, it is a matter within the discretion of the trial court whether to permit the government’s representative to testify, even though the wit…
• United States v. Valencia, 609 F.2d 603 (2d Cir. 1979)
  …earlier indictment, jeopardy did not attach. Of course, however, it is axiomatic of the double jeopardy clause that jeopardy attached once Jesus’s guilty plea was accepted. See United States v. Bullock, 579 F. 2d 1116, 1118 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 967, 99 S.Ct. 456, 58 L.Ed.2d 425 (1978); United States v. Williams, 534 F. 2d 119, 120 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 894, 97 S.Ct. 255, 50 L.Ed.2d 177 (1976); United States v. Young, 503 F. 2d 1072, 1074 n. 5 (3d Cir. 1974); United States v. Jerry…
• United States v. Baptista-Rodriguez, 17 F.3d 1354 (11th Cir. 1994)
  …3, 19, 14 L.Ed. 306 (1852)). The appellants concede that the Bahamas is an independent sovereign and that this fact ordinarily would preclude their double jeopardy claims. See United States v. Martin, 574 F. 2d 1359, 1360 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 967, 99 S.Ct. 456, 58 L.Ed.2d 425 (1978). They assert, nonetheless, that an exception to the dual sovereignty doctrine applies in this case. They argue that the Bahamian prosecution was merely a “sham”—a “tool or ‘cat’s paw1 ” of the United States—and…