EDWARDS

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (73 total)

• Howell v. State, 418 So. 2d 1164 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982)
  …f.” United States v. Avalos, 541 F. 2d 1100, 1110 (5th Cir.), reh. en banc denied, 545 F. 2d 168 (1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 970, 97 S.Ct. 1656, 52 L.Ed.2d 363 (1977); cf. United States v. Edwards, 577 F. 2d 883, 889-890 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 968, 99 S.Ct. 458, 58 L.Ed.2d 427 (1978).2 Thus, both the purposes of the due process and speedy trial provisions, as well as the time periods to which each is applicable, are different. Similarly, the analysis for determining violations of the respect…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Clark A. Caplan v. State, 515 So. 2d 1362 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987)
  …Dakota v. Opperman, 428 U.S. 364, 96 S.Ct. 3092, 49 L.Ed.2d 1000 (1976); United States v. Scott, 665 F. 2d 874 (9th Cir.1981); United States v. Prescott, 599 F. 2d 103 (5th Cir.1979); United States v. Edwards, 577 F. 2d 883 (5th Cir.), cert, denied, 439 U.S. 968, 99 S.Ct. 458, 58 L.Ed.2d 427 (1978); In Re One 1965 Econoline, I.D. No. E16JH702043, Arizona License No. EC-7887, 109 Ariz. 433, 511 P. 2d 168 (1973); Miller v. State, 403 So. 2d 1307 (Fla. 1981). We also note that, although the officer did not op…
• United States v. Salvucci, 448 U.S. 83 (U.S. 1980)
  …, 550 F. 2d 1066 (1977). Most of the remaining Circuits appear to have retained the rule, but many with “misgivings.” See, e. g., United States v. Oates, 560 F. 2d 45, 52 (CA2 1977) ; United States v. Edwards, 577 F. 2d 883, 892 (CA5), cert. denied, 439 U. S. 968 (1978). In Brown v. United States, 411 U. S. 223, 229 (1973), this Court clarified that the automatic standing rule of Jones was applicable only where the offense charged “possession of the seized evidence at the time of the contested search and se…