WEST

v.

SMITH, CORRECTIONAL SUPERINTENDENT

Citator

Cited By (14 total)

• In re Japanese Elec. Prods. Antitrust Litig. (D.C. MDL No. 189). Zenith Radio Corp. v. Matsushita Elec. Indus. Co., Ltd., 723 F.2d 238 (3d Cir. 1983)
  …of Fed.R.Civ.P. 52. But a determination of untrustworthiness, if predicated on factors properly extraneous to such a determination, would be an error of law.35 See Lloyd v. American Export Lines, Inc., 580 F. 2d 1179, 1183 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 969, 99 S.Ct. 461, 58 L.Ed.2d 428 (1978). There is no discretion to rely on improper factors. Such an error of law might, of course, in a given instance be harmless within the meaning of Fed.R.Civ.P. 61. In weighing factors which we consider proper, [*…
• In re Plywood Antitrust Litig. French Quarter Apts., Ltd. v. Georgia-Pacific Corp., 655 F.2d 627 (5th Cir. 1981)
  …Roudebush, 425 U.S. 840, 863 n.39, 96 S.Ct. 1949, 1960, 48 L.Ed.2d 416 (1976) (administrative findings with respect to employment discrimination claim admissible); Lloyd v. American Export Lines, Inc., 580 F. 2d 1179, 1183 (3rd Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 969, 99 S.Ct. 461, 58 L.Ed.2d 428 (1978) (findings in Decision and Order of Coast Guard hearing examiner admissible); United States v. School District of Ferndale, 577 F. 2d 1339, 1354-55 (6th Cir. 1978) (findings of Department of Health, Education, and…
• United States v. Yitchak Ijo Perlmuter, 693 F.2d 1290 (9th Cir. 1982)
  …isite to the use of this rule, not the thing to be proved. Rule 803(22) will not serve the Government without introduction into evidence of the judgment of conviction. See Lloyd v. American Export Lines, 580 F. 2d 1179, 1190 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 969, 99 S.Ct. 461, 58 L.Ed.2d 428 (1978); J. Weinstein, Weinstein’s Evidence ¶ 803(22)[01] at 803-271 et seq. C. THE RESIDUAL EXCEPTION, Fed. R.Evid. 803(24) Rule 803(24) provides a residual exception for evidence which does not meet the requirements…