DONALD STUBBINS, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
DONALD STUBBINS, APPELLANT,
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
207 So. 2d 300
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1968)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
On this appeal by the defendant below from a conviction for robbery, following trial by the court, reversal is sought on the contention that the evidence was insufficient to support the judgment. We have examined and considered the record and the briefs, and conclude that the trial court’s finding of guilt had adequate evi-dentiary support, and that no reversible error has been shown.
Affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
The Nw. Bank v. Cortner, 275 So. 2d 317 (Fla. 2d DCA 1973)…ss Inspectors Ass’n, 1910, 59 Fla. 239, 52 So. 715; Spadaro v. Baird, 1929, 97 Fla. 50, 119 So. 788; McGhee Interests, Inc. v. Alexander Bank, 1931, 102 Fla. 140, 135 So. 545; Johnson v. Smith, Fla.1956, 84 So. 2d 722; Baker v. Maytag, Fla.App.1968, 207 So. 2d 300; Holcomb v. Bardill, Fla.App.1968, 214 So. 2d 522; 7 Fla.Jur., Contracts, § 78; 17 Am. Jur.2d, Contracts, § 264. See also Miami National Bank v. Fink, Fla.App.1965, 174 So. 2d 38, where the court considered the guaranty agreement and the collateral…