MORPURGO
v.
PROFESSIONAL STAFF CONGRESS/CUNY ET AL.
MORPURGO
PROFESSIONAL STAFF CONGRESS/CUNY ET AL.
439 U.S. 1000
Supreme Court of the United States (1978)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
The Nat'l Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. Civiletti, 609 F.2d 514 (D.C. Cir. 1979)…The Government relies on, and the majority cites with approval, court decisions that have held that § 1988 does not apply to the United States, Shannon v. HUD, 433 F.Supp. 249 (E.D. Pa.1977), aff'd per curiam, 577 F. 2d 854 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 1000, 99 S.Ct. 611, 58 L.Ed.2d 677 (1978); Southeast Legal Defense Group [SLDG] v. Adams, 436 F.Supp. 891 (D.Or.1977). The District Courts that decided the Shannon and SLDG cases did not have the benefit of the Supreme Court’s comment in Hutto v. Finney,…