SMITH

v.

MARYLAND

Citator

Cited By

• Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307 (U.S. 1979)
  …a, a federal habeas corpus court must [*313] consider not whether there was any evidence to support a state-court conviction, but whether there was sufficient evidence to justify a rational trier of the facts to find guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. 439 U. S. 1001. II Our inquiry in this case is narrow. The petitioner has not seriously questioned any aspect of Virginia law governing the allocation of the burden of production or persuasion in a murder trial. See Mullaney v. Wilbur, 421 U. S. 684; Patterson v…
• Smith v. Maryland, 442 U.S. 735 (U.S. 1979)
  …egister evidence here be excluded. Id., at 174, 178, 389 A. 2d, at 868, 870. Certiorari was granted in order to resolve indications of conflict in the decided cases as to the restrictions imposed by the Fourth Amendment on the use of pen registers.3 439 U. S. 1001 (1978). [*739] II A The Fourth Amendment guarantees “'[t]he right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures.” In determining whether a particular form of government-initiat…
• John and Dolores Rank v. Nimmo, 677 F.2d 692 (9th Cir. 1982)
  …has engaged in monopolistic practices is committed to the agency’s discretion, 15 U.S.C. § 45(b) requires the F.T.C. to make such a determination before issuing an F.T.C. complaint); Abrams v. Hills, 547 F. 2d 1062 (9th Cir. 1976), cert, dismissed, 439 U.S. 1001, 99 S.Ct. 607, 58 L.Ed.2d 675 (1978) (Congress did not intend to give the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development the discretion to decline to spend any of the money targeted for the operating subsidy program.) In short, we conclude that the VA’s…

  ← 1 / 2 →