WORCHESTER

v.

CRISP, WARDEN, ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Escalante, 637 F.2d 1197 (9th Cir. 1980)
  …14 is whether a joint trial would be so prejudicial that the trial judge could exercise his discretion in only one way. United States v. Mills, 597 F. 2d 693, 696 (9th Cir. 1979); United States v. Adams, 581 F. 2d 193, 198 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 1006, 99 S.Ct. 621, 58 L.Ed.2d 683 (1978). The ruling of the trial judge will rarely be disturbed on appeal. United States v. McPartlin, 595 F. 2d 1321, 1333 (7th Cir. 1979); United States v. Campanale, 518 F. 2d 352, 359 (9th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 4…
• United States v. Kegler, 724 F.2d 190 (D.C. Cir. 1983)
  …iary Standard In weighing the evidentiary support for that verdict, it is elementary that we are required to view the evidence in the light most favorable to the jury’s verdict. United States v. Foster, 584 F. 2d 997, 1000 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 1006, 99 S.Ct. 620, 58 L.Ed.2d 682 (1978) (citing cases). There is no legal distinction between testimonial (direct) and circumstantial evidence: Circumstantial evidence ... is intrinsically no different from testimonial evidence. Admittedly, circumstan…
• Chaussard v. Fulcomer, 816 F.2d 925 (3d Cir. 1987)
  …issible under the sixth amendment. . The opinion in Wicker does not state whether a recording of the hypnosis was reviewed by the petitioner at the time of his state trial. . United States v. Adams, 581 F. 2d 193, 199 n. 12 (9th Cir.), cert. den., 439 U.S. 1006, 99 S.Ct. 621, 58 L.Ed.2d 683 (1978), is not to the contrary. The court’s statement that, at a minimum, some recording must be made of the hypnosis was an evidentiary, not a constitutional ruling. For other discussions of the law of evidence as it r…