INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION

v.

CHICAGO & NORTH WESTERN TRANSPORTATION CO. ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (66 total)

• Pelletier v. Zweifel, 921 F.2d 1465 (11th Cir. 1991)
  …343, bankruptcy fraud, id. § 152, or securities fraud, 15 U.S.C. § 78j(b), Rule 10b-5, or that Zweifel aided and abetted Culpepper in the commission of these acts, see Rolf v. Blyth, Eastman Dillon & Co., 570 F. 2d 38, 47-48 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 1039, 99 S.Ct. 642, 58 L.Ed.2d 698 (1978).67 Private litigants can recover for racketeering injuries under 18 U.S.C. § 1964(c), but their injury must “flow from the commission of the predicate acts.” Sedima, 473 U.S. at 497, 105 S.Ct. at 3285. This mean…
• Cent. Bank of Denver v. First Interstate Bank of Denver, 511 U.S. 164 (U.S. 1994)
  …al application of the concept of aiding and abetting liability to achieve the remedial purposes of the securities laws,” H. R. Rep. No. 98-355, p. 10 (1983), and notes with favor Rolfv. Blyth, Eastman Dillon & Co., 570 F. 2d 38 (CA2), cert, denied, 439 U. S. 1039 (1978), which affirmed a judgment against an aider and abettor in a private action under § 10(b) and Rule 10b-5. Moreover, § 5 of the [*198] Insider Trading and Securities Fraud Enforcement Act of 1988, Pub. L. 100-704, 102 Stat. 4681, contains an…
• Huddleston v. Herman & MacLEAN, 640 F.2d 534 (5th Cir. 1981)
  …n the prospectus, that H&M acted with the requisite scienter. “Proof of a defendant’s knowledge or intent [in a Rule 10b-5 action] will often be inferential. . .. ” Rolf v. Blyth, Eastman Dillon & Co., Inc., 570 F. 2d 38, 47 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 1039, [*547] 99 S.Ct. 642, 58 L.Ed.2d 698 (1978).21 We conclude that the circumstantial evidence was sufficient to preclude a directed verdict in favor of H&M. C. Reliance and Causation Reliance and causation are related concepts. In the common law dec…

  ← 1 / 2 →