NORTH CAROLINA

v.

BUTLER

Citator

Cited By (42 total)

• North Carolina v. Butler, 441 U.S. 369 (U.S. 1979)
  …itted in evidence against him unless, at the time the statement was made, he explicitly waived the right to the presence of a lawyer. We granted certiorari to consider whether this per se rule reflects a proper understanding of the Miranda decision. 439 U. S. 1046. The respondent was convicted in a North Carolina trial court of kidnaping, armed robbery, and felonious assault. The evidence at his trial showed that he and a man named Elmer Lee had robbed a gas station in Goldsboro, N. C., in December 1976, and…
• Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Tufts, 461 U.S. 300 (U.S. 1983)
  …t the sale resulted in a partnership capital gain of approximately $400,000. His theory was that the partnership had realized the full amount of the nonrecourse obligation.2 Relying on Millar v. Commissioner, 577 F. 2d 212, 215 (CA3), cert. denied, 439 U. S. 1046 (1978), the United States Tax Court, in an unreviewed decision, upheld the asserted deficiencies. 70 T. C. 756 (1978). The United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit reversed. 651 F. 2d 1058 (1981). That court expressly disagreed with the…

  ← 1 / 3 →
• United States & Special Agent Glenn J. Kulas v. KIS, 658 F.2d 526 (7th Cir. 1981)
  …he criminal field. Interlocutory review of subpoenas issued for discovery under Fed.R.Civ.P. 45 may also be obtained only as a defense to a contempt citation.16 Nothing in In re Special April 1977 Grand Jury, 581 F. 2d 589 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 1046, 99 S.Ct. 721, 58 L.Ed.2d 705 (1979), requires a holding to the contrary. That decision permitted a post-compliance appeal of an order enforcing grand jury subpoenas, but it is distinguishable in one significant respect.17 In that ease, the subpoena…

  ← 1 / 2 →