GORDON

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (61 total)

• Fid. Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass'n v. DE LA Cuesta, 458 U.S. 141 (U.S. 1982)
  …77 (Board regulation authorizing federal savings and loans to maintain reserve accounts for tax and insurance payments does not occupy the field of reserve accounts or pre-empt state law requiring payment of interest on such accounts), cert. denied, 439 U. S. 1051 (1978). Cf. Gulf Federal Sav. & Loan Assn. v. Federal Home Loan Bank Bd., 651 F. 2d 259, 266 (CA5 1981) (Board has authority only over internal management of federal savings and loans, and not over disputed loan agreement provisions), cert, pending,…
• United States v. Blasco, 702 F.2d 1315 (11th Cir. 1983)
  …in failing to strike the testimony concerning the mystery bag. On appeal, we must decide whether the presence of the bag of marijuana at trial probably would have changed the verdict. United States v. Gordon, 580 F. 2d 827 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 1051, 99 S.Ct. 731, 58 L.Ed.2d 711 (1978). We agree with the government that the failure to produce a one-pound bag of marijuana where approximately 31,000 pounds were seized was hardly prejudicial. The trial judge committed no error in allowing the tes…
• United States v. Hartley, 678 F.2d 961 (11th Cir. 1982)
  …veloped a “bad faith” test.27 Absent an indication of “improper governmental motive,” the court has consistently refused to find a due process violation sufficient to warrant reversal. United States v. Gordon, 580 F. 2d 827 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 1051, 99 S.Ct. 731, 58 L.Ed.2d 711 (1978); Armstrong v. Collier, 536 F. 2d 72 (5th Cir. 1976). In applying this standard to the consumption claim, the District Court found that “[w]hile the consumption of the shrimp was ‘intentional’, [sic] there is no…