ARROW FOOD DISTRIBUTORS, INC.

v.

LOVE, CONSERVATOR

Citator

Cited By

• Anderson v. Malloy, 700 F.2d 1208 (8th Cir. 1983)
  …of subsequent repairs to telephone line after the defendant inferred that line was not placed below statutory minimum height requirements); Kenny v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority, 581 F. 2d 351, 356 (3d Cir.1978), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 1073, 99 S.Ct. 845, 59 L.Ed.2d 39 (1979) (defendant inferred that lighting was adequate on railroad platform at time plaintiff was raped; plaintiff allowed to show that, after the rape, defendant installed new lighting fixtures); American Airlines, Inc.…
• Berry v. Dep't OF Just., 733 F.2d 1343 (9th Cir. 1984)
  …to withhold information do not qualify as withholding statutes. Statutes that do not permit agencies “wholly discretionary non-disclosure” may qualify for the exemption. Lee Pharmaceuticals v. Kreps, 577 F. 2d 610, 615 (9th Cir.1978), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 1073, 99 S.Ct. 847, 59 L.Ed.2d 40 (1979). An exemption will exist where there has been a Congressional determination that “the public interest in maintaining confidentiality of public records outweighs the competing interest in having their contents re…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Peterson v. Crown Fin. Corp., 661 F.2d 287 (3d Cir. 1981)
  …court determined that six percent was “the applicable interest rate in contract-related claims,” Sun Shipbuilding & Dry Dock Co. v. United States Lines, Inc., 439 F.Supp. 671, 677 n.7 (E.D.Pa.1977), aff’d 582 F. 2d 1276 (3d Cir. 1978), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 1073, 99 S.Ct. 846, 59 L.Ed.2d 40 (1979), and noted that, even if Peterson’s claim could fairly be characterized as an equitable claim for restitution, “six percent remains the appropriate measure.” 498 F.Supp. at 1180 (citing Nationwide Mutual Insurance…

  ← 1 / 3 →