NORTHERN CALIFORNIA SUPERMARKETS, INC.

v.

CENTRAL CALIFORNIA LETTUCE PRODUCERS COOPERATIVE ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (28 total)

• Thomason v. State, 620 So. 2d 1234 (Fla. 1993)
  …” of the evidence. On this record the declaration of a mistrial cannot properly be sustained, over appellant’s objection, as having been required by a “high degree” of necessity. Dunkerly v. Hogan, 579 F. 2d 141, 147-48 (2d Cir.1978), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 1090, 99 S.Ct. 872, 59 L.Ed.2d 56 (1979) (footnote omitted) (emphasis supplied). This Court has only briefly discussed what constitutes instances of “manifestly urgent and absolute necessity” justifying declaration of a mistrial. State ex rel. Williams…
• Cannon v. Univ. of Chicago, 441 U.S. 677 (U.S. 1979)
  …implication of a private action directly from the constitutional or statutory source of the federal-law elements. Compare Division 1287, Amalgamated Transit Union v. Kansas City Area Transportation Authority, 582 F. 2d 444 (CA8 1978), cert. denied, 439 U. S. 1090 (1979); Local 619, Amalgamated Transit Union v. LaCrosse Municipal Transit Utility, 585 F. 2d 1340 (CA7 1978), with Local 619, Amalgamated Transit Union v. Greater Portland Transit Dist., 589 F. 2d 1 (CA1 1978). To the extent an expansive interpre…
• Jackson Transit Auth. v. Local Div. 1285, 457 U.S. 15 (U.S. 1982)
  …al Div. 519, Amalgamated Transit Union, AFL-CIO v. LaCrosse Municipal Transit Utility, 585 F. 2d 1340 (CA7 1978); Division 1287, Amalgamated Transit Union, AFL-CIO v. Kansas City Area Transportation Authority, 582 F. 2d 444 (CA8 1978), cert. denied, 439 U. S. 1090 (1979). One Court of Appeals has reached the opposite conclusion. Local Div. 732, Amalgamated Transit Union v. Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority, 667 F. 2d 1327 (CA11 1982). In a related decision, the First Circuit has concluded that…