GARFINKLE ET VIR

v.

SUPERIOR COURT OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY (WELLS FARGO BANK ET AL., REAL PARTIES IN INTEREST)

Citator

Cited By

• RON Tonkin Gran Turismo, Inc. v. Fiat Distribs., Inc., 637 F.2d 1376 (9th Cir. 1981)
  …not helpful in resolving this case. Two recent Second Circuit decisions are instructive. In Oreck Corporation v. Whirlpool Corporation, 579 F. 2d 126 (CA2 1978) (en banc), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 946, 99 S.Ct. 340, 58 L.Ed.2d 338, rehearing denied, 439 U.S. 1104, 99 S.Ct. 883, 59 L.Ed.2d 65 (1979), Oreck charged Whirlpool and Sears with engaging in a conspiracy in unreasonable restraint of trade to exclude Oreck from the vacuum cleaner market. Oreck had been the exclusive distributor of vacuum cleaners unde…
• Nifty Foods Corp. v. The Great Atl. & Pac. TEA Co., Inc., 614 F.2d 832 (2d Cir. 1980)
  …by its termination, this alone does not convert A&P’s decision into a violation of the antitrust laws. See Oreck Corp. v. Whirlpool Corp., 579 F. 2d 126 (2d Cir. 1978) (en banc), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 946, 99 S.Ct. 340, 58 L.Ed.2d 338, reh. denied, 439 U.S. 1104, 99 S.Ct. 883, 59 L.Ed.2d 65 (1978). VI. Counts VI and VII incorporate and reallege parts of Counts IV and V as a common law tort of unfair competition. Nifty has not stated a cause of action for unfair competition under New York law, and these co…