STARR

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (12 total)

• Familias Unidas v. Dolph Briscoe, 619 F.2d 391 (5th Cir. 1980)
  …l issue constitutes the law of the case and, absent some significant intervening change of circumstances, precludes our reconsideration of the matter. See Pettway v. American Cast Iron Pipe Co., 576 F. 2d 1157, 1189-90 (5th Cir. 1978), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 1115, 99 S.Ct. 1020, 59 L.Ed.2d 74 (1979) (previous panel determination not binding in light of intervening Supreme Court decision). Nothing has transpired since the earlier decision to undercut the ruling that the case is not moot. Accordingly, we adher…
• Dr. Robert E. Whiting, Ph.D. v. Jackson State Univ. & John A. Peoples, 616 F.2d 116 (5th Cir. 1980)
  …plaintiff in a section 706 action may recover back pay, costs, and attorneys’ fees; and (2) we have already held that interest is properly awarded on back pay. Pettway v. American Cast Iron Pipe Co., 494 F. 2d 211, 263 (5th Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 1115, 99 S.Ct. 1020, 59 L.Ed.2d 74 (1979). Since Whiting produced sufficient evidence to warrant jury submission on his Title VII claim, no eleventh amendment bar precludes the monetary relief in this case. Consequently, we need not examine the effect o…
• United States v. DeLUNA, 763 F.2d 897 (8th Cir. 1985)
  …to call a co-defendant as a witness, unless the defendant shows that the co-defendant is likely to testify at a separate trial and the testimony would exculpate him [or her].” United States v. Starr, 584 F. 2d 235, 239 (8th Cir.1978), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 1115, 99 S.Ct. 1019, 59 L.Ed.2d 73 (1979). Here, counsel for Carl Civella stated in camera that Carl Civella had affirmatively represented that he would testify on behalf of Thomas if the trials were severed. That is a sufficient showing that the co-defe…