MCDANIEL

v.

ARIZONA

Citator

Cited By

• Westbrook v. Zant, 704 F.2d 1487 (11th Cir. 1983)
  …y jury commission’s procedures in selecting the grand and traverse jury pools. West-brook claims that such a situation occurred in Gibson v. Jackson, 443 F.Supp. 239 (M.D.Ga.1977), rev’d on other grounds, 578 F. 2d 1045 (5th Cir.1978), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 1119, 99 S.Ct. 1028, 59 L.Ed.2d 79 (1979). Gibson presented as a tangential issue, the composition of the jury pools in Jones County. Gibson was in litigation in the Middle District of Georgia during the time of Westbrook’s jury trial in Jones County.…
• Duncan, 657 F.2d 691 (5th Cir. 1981)
  …aw and there is a likelihood that clarification of the state law will moot or substantially alter the federal question. See Palmer v. Jackson, 617 F. 2d 424, 428 (5th Cir. 1980); Gibson v. Jackson, 578 F. 2d 1045, 1048 (5th Cir. 1978), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 1119, 99 S.Ct. 1028, 59 L.Ed.2d 79 (1979).4 While ambiguity in a state’s law and the likelihood of avoiding constitutional adjudication are both necessary for Pullman abstention, they are not always sufficient, since abstention is a matter of “principle…
• Nulf v. Int'l Paper Co., 656 F.2d 553 (10th Cir. 1981)
  …iscretion, United States v. Heath, 580 F. 2d 1011, 1026 (10th Cir. 1978), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 1075, 99 S.Ct. 850, 59 L.Ed.2d 42 (1979), which was clearly prejudicial. United States v. Smaldone, 583 F. 2d 1129, 1133 (10th Cir. 1978), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 1119, 99 S.Ct. 1029, 59 L.Ed.2d 80 (1979). We cannot say that the trial court abused its discretion in restricting cross-examination of Keller on the three matters of which Nulf complains. Nulf claims the trial court not only restricted the scope of cro…