HUTTO ET AL.

v.

FINNEY ET AL.; RAKAS ET AL. V. ILLINOIS; KING V. NORRIS; TRACY, JUDGE V. DIXON ET AL.; MOSLEY V. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR ET AL.; FORD V. MUIR, U. S. DISTRICT JUDGE, ET AL.; ALDERMAN V. GEORGIA; ROGERS V. DOUGLAS ET UX.

Citator

Cited By (15 total)

• Andrews v. State, 536 So. 2d 1108 (Fla. 4th DCA 1988)
  …DOWNEY, LETTS, GLICKSTEIN, DELL and GUNTHER, JJ., concur. STONE, J., concurs in part and dissents in part with opinion, with which ANSTEAD and WALDEN, JJ., concur. . Rakas v. Illinois, 439 U.S. 128, 99 S.Ct. 421, 58 L.Ed.2d 387 (1978), reh'g denied, 439 U.S. 1122, 99 S.Ct. 1035, 59 L.Ed.2d 83 (1979), in which the United States Supreme Court subsumed the standing requirement under substantive fourth amendment doctrine in determining whether a defendant is entitled to claim the protections of the exclusionary…
• State v. Williams, 424 So. 2d 212 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983)
  …no standing to complain of the search conducted upon the persons of the other two individuals. United States v. Salvucci, 448 U.S. 83, 100 S.Ct. 2547, 65 L.Ed.2d 619 (1980); Bakas v. Illinois, 439 U.S. 128, 99 S.Ct. 421, 58 L.Ed.2d 387, reh’g denied 439 U.S. 1122, 99 S.Ct. 1035, 59 L.Ed.2d 83 (1978). The officers did not violate the appellee’s fourth amendment rights. Therefore, appellee has no standing to complain that the officers violated the fourth amendment rights of third parties. State v. Ferguson, 41…
• Beck v. Alabama, 447 U.S. 625 (U.S. 1980)
  …ntence it is required [*632] to impose after a finding of guilt is merely advisory.7 In a brief opinion denying review, the Alabama Supreme Court also rejected petitioner’s arguments, citing Jacobs v. State, 361 So. 2d 640 (Ala. 1978), cert. denied, 439 U. S. 1122, in which it had upheld the constitutionality of the Alabama death penalty statute against a similar challenge. 365 So. 2d 1006, 1007 (1978). In this Court petitioner contends that the prohibition on giving lesser included offense instructions in c…

  ← 1 / 4 →