SILO

v.

PENNSYLVANIA

Citator

Cited By (54 total)

• Jones v. State, 648 So. 2d 669 (Fla. 1994)
  …0 Pa. 15, 389 A. 2d 62 (1978) (hospital staff cannot consent to search or seizure of patient’s effects because staff does not have right to mutual use of effects; staffs access and control are for sole purpose of safeguarding effects), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 1132, 99 S.Ct. 1053, 59 L.Ed.2d 94 (1979); Morris v. Commonwealth, 208 Va. 331,157 S.E. 2d 191 (1967) (hospital personnel had no authority to consent to seizure of patient’s effects from hospital room). Likewise, hospital security, acting as bailee of…
• United States v. Thevis, 665 F.2d 616 (5th Cir. 1982)
  …’ uniform approval of excluding testimony exactly like Buckhout’s. United States v. Fosher, 590 F. 2d 381, 382-84 (1st Cir. 1979) (Buckhout’s specific testimony excluded); United States v. Watson, 587 F. 2d 365, 368-69 (7th Cir. 1978), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 1132, 99 S.Ct. 1055, 59 L.Ed.2d 95 (1979); United States v. Brown, 540 F. 2d 1048, 1053-54 (10th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1100, 97 S.Ct. 1122, 51 L.Ed.2d 549 (1977); United States v. Brown, 501 F. 2d 146 (9th Cir. 1974), rev’d on other grounds…
• United States v. West, 670 F.2d 675 (7th Cir. 1982)
  …rt’s admissibility ruling is limited to determining whether the court abused its wide discretion concerning admissibility of expert testimony. United States v. Watson, 587 F. 2d 365, 369 (7th Cir. 1978), cert. denied sub nom. Davis v. United States, 439 U.S. 1132, 99 S.Ct. 1055, 59 L.Ed.2d 95 (1979). Expert testimony is admissible only when the specialized knowledge of an expert will assist the trier of fact in understanding the evidence or in determining a fact in issue. Fed.R.Evid. 702. “The theory upon w…