WENTLAND

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (50 total)

• United States v. Phillips, 664 F.2d 971 (5th Cir. 1981)
  …s claim of withdrawal from a conspiracy: In order to withdraw, a conspirator must show that he acted affirmatively to defeat or disavow the purpose of the conspiracy. United States v. Wentland, 582 F. 2d 1022, 1025-26 (5th Cir. 1978), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 1133, 99 S.Ct. 1056, 59 L.Ed.2d 96 (1979). See also United States v. Jimenez, 622 F. 2d 753, 755 (5th Cir. 1980) (to show withdrawal, defendant must demonstrate that he took affirmative acts inconsistent with the object of the conspiracy and communicated…
• Williams v. United States, 458 U.S. 279 (U.S. 1982)
  …l information needed to avoid deception in connection with loan transactions covered by §1014 constitutes a “false statement or report,” and thus violates the statute. See, e. g., United States v. Greene, 578 F. 2d 648, 657 (CA5 1978), cert. denied, 439 U. S. 1133 (1979). I assume that the majority would not disagree with this analysis, which is based on established contract principles. I am at a loss as to why the majority does not apply the same analysis to the transactions at issue in this case. The major…
• United States v. Wuagneux, 683 F.2d 1343 (11th Cir. 1982)
  …llant argues the evidence failed to show the statement was materially false, this question was for the jury and there is sufficient evidence to support their conclusions. See United States v. Greene, 578 F. 2d 648, 657 (5th Cir. 1978), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 1133, 99 S.Ct. 1056, 59 L.Ed.2d 96 (1979). We also conclude there was sufficient evidence that appellant understated his income on his individual income tax returns as charged in Counts 10 through 13. Each count charged understatement of income for a se…