CLIFTON
v.
CALIFORNIA, HINDMAN V. KELLY ET AL.

U.S. | 1979-01-22
Nos. 78-5539; No. 78-5611
439 U.S. 1136 Supreme Court of the United States (1979) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • United States v. Addonizio, 442 U.S. 178 (U.S. 1979)
    …time, a decision above the guidelines is warranted. Parole at this time would depreciate the seriousness of the offense and promote disrespect for the law.” 573 F. 2d, at 153-154. Bonanno v. United States, 571 F. 2d 588 (CA9 1978), cert. dismissed, 439 U. S. 1136. United States v. Whelan & Flaherty. In that case, two federal prisoners filed motions under 28 U. S. C. §§ 2241 and 2255 challenging their confinement. The § 2241 motion was denied by the District Court; the Court of Appeals affirmed, 573 F. 2d 14…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw