WASHINGTON ET AL.

v.

CONFEDERATED TRIBES OF THE COLVILLE INDIAN RESERVATION ET AL.; AND WASHINGTON V. UNITED STATES ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Washington v. Confederated Tribes of the Colville Indian Reservation, 447 U.S. 134 (U.S. 1980)
  …i Tribes was unconstitutional. The court enjoined enforcement of the statutes it had struck down, and the State moved unsuccessfully for a new trial. This appeal followed. We postponed consideration of certain jurisdictional questions to the merits. 440 U. S. 905 (1979). We begin by sketching the relevant factual background, which is not seriously in dispute.6 Thereafter, we explore the jurisdictional questions previously postponed and then turn to the merits. II The State of Washington levies a cigarette…
• Andrus v. Allard, 444 U.S. 51 (U.S. 1979)
  …artifacts owned before the effective date of the subject statute,” and enjoining appellants “from any interference with the exercise of such rights, including the rights of sale, barter or exchange.” Id., at 16a-17a. We noted probable jurisdiction. 440 U. S. 905 (1979). We reverse. I Appellant Secretary of the Interior contends that both the Eagle Protection and Migratory Bird Treaty Acts contemplate [*56] regulatory prohibition of commerce in the parts of protected birds, without regard to when those bi…
• Bd. of Educ. of the City Sch. Dist. of N.Y. v. Harris, 444 U.S. 130 (U.S. 1979)
  …ustifications were either inadequate to explain the disparities or were unsupported by facts appearing on the record. Ibid. Because of the importance of the issue, we granted certiorari. Sub nom. Board of Education of City School Dist. v. Califano, 440 U. S. 905 (1979). The stay preserving the funds remains in effect. See Fed. Rule App. Proc. 41 (b). Ill Our primary concern is with the intent of Congress. Section 706 sets forth the eligibility criteria for ESAA funding. In subsection (a)(1) it authorizes…