WORLD-WIDE VOLKSWAGEN CORP. ET AL.

v.

WOODSON, JUDGE, ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (86 total)

• World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. Woodson, 444 U.S. 286 (U.S. 1980)
  …he State of Oklahoma. This being the case, we hold that under the facts presented, the trial court was justified in coneluding [*291] that the petitioners derive substantial revenue from goods used or consumed in this State.” We granted certiorari, 440 U. S. 907 (1979), to consider an important constitutional question with respect to state-court jurisdiction and to resolve a conflict between the Supreme Court of Oklahoma and the highest courts of at least four other States.9 We reverse. II The Due Process…
• United States v. Crews, 445 U.S. 463 (U.S. 1980)
  …its admission. Finding these exceptions inapplicable, the Court of Appeals concluded that, the in-court identification testimony should have been excluded as a product of the violation of respondent’s Fourth Amendment rights. We granted certiorari. 440 U. S. 907 (1979). We reverse. II Wong Sun, supra, articulated the guiding principle for determining whether evidence derivatively obtained from a violation of the Fourth Amendment is admissible against the accused at trial: “The exclusionary prohibition ex…
• United States v. Diecidue, 603 F.2d 535 (5th Cir. 1979)
  …this Court has found that defendants are subjected to no prejudice in conspiracy trials where the Government proves overt acts not stated in the indictment or a bill of particulars. United States v. Johnson, 575 F. 2d 1347 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 907, 99 S.Ct. 1214, 59 L.Ed. 2d 454 (1979). Defendant complains generally that denial of the bill of particulars forced him to reconstruct his whereabouts and activities for the total time involved in the two allegations, at most two months. Defendant,…