SPINKA, DBA NORTH GRAND DENTAL LABORATORY, ET AL.

v.

WATSON, DIRECTOR, DEPARTMENT OF REGISTRATION AND EDUCATION OF ILLINOIS, ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (46 total)

• Huffman v. B.J. Davis, 571 So. 2d 1371 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990)
  …ct in retaliation for the exercise of a constitutionally protected right is actionable under section 1983 even if the act, when taken for a different reason, would have been proper.” Buise v. Hudkins, 584 F. 2d 223, 229 (7th Cir.1978), cert, denied, 440 U.S. 916, 99 S.Ct. 1234, 59 L.Ed.2d 466 (1979). Appellee correctly points out that the due process clause does not itself protect a prisoner against job reassignment, and that an assignment as an inmate law clerk does not give the inmate, or those inmates wh…
• Fidel Ramos v. The Honorable Richard D. Lamm, 639 F.2d 559 (10th Cir. 1980)
  …hese critical factors.29 Consequently we think [*585] the State has failed to demonstrate that it has furnished an adequate alternative means of access to the courts for the inmates. See Buise v. Hudkins, 584 F. 2d 223, 228 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 916, 99 S.Ct. 1234, 59 L.Ed.2d 466; Cruz v. Hauck, 515 F. 2d 322, 332 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 424 U.S. 917, 96 S.Ct. 1118, 47 L.Ed.2d 322; compare Hampton v. Schauer, 361 F.Supp. 641 (D.Colo.). In this connection we note that there is no evidence th…
• Shango (Cleve Heidelberg v. Jurich, 681 F.2d 1091 (7th Cir. 1982)
  …nsfer an inmate from one institution to another. For example, state officials may not transfer an inmate to punish him for his exercise of his fundamental constitutional rights. See Buise v. Hudkins, 584 F. 2d 223, 229 (7th Cir. 1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 916, 99 S.Ct. 1234, 59 L.Ed.2d 466 (1979). See generally McDonald v. Hall, 610 F. 2d 16, 18 (1st Cir. 1979). State actors are prohibited from taking such action, of course, even if they provide the inmate with a hearing. See Montanye v. Haymes, 427 U.S.…