HARRIS

v.

WINSTON ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Augustin Alvarez, 755 F.2d 830 (11th Cir. 1985)
  …nd that Counts III and IV therefore should have been dismissed. We disagree. The argument that BATF agents are not protected under section 1114 was rejected by the Second Circuit in United States v. Lopez, 586 F. 2d 978 (2d Cir.1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 923, 99 S.Ct. 1251, 59 L.Ed.2d 476 (1979). The Lopez court explained that, prior to 1972, the functions of the BATF were conducted by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS), and IRS agents, officers, and employees were explicitly mentioned in section 1114.…
• Douglas v. Louie L. Wainwright, 714 F.2d 1532 (11th Cir. 1983)
  …cient relevant facts, “the record before the district court was sufficient for a proper examination of [petitioner’s] claims.” Winfrey v. Maggio, 664 F. 2d 550, 552 (5th Cir.1981). See Flores v. Estelle, 578 F. 2d 80 (5th Cir. 1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 923, 99 S.Ct. 1253, 59 L.Ed.2d 477 (1979) (where state has provided a full and fair hearing on the issue raised in federal habeas, based on that record the federal court can adjudicate without repeating the hearing process). In the instant case, as the…
• United States v. Emmett Lovell Nabors, 901 F.2d 1351 (6th Cir. 1990)
  …United States v. Alvarez, 755 F. 2d 830, 840-841 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 905, 106 S.Ct. 274, 88 L.Ed.2d 235 (1985); United States v. Czech, 671 F. 2d 1195 (8th Cir.1982); United States v. Lopez, 586 F. 2d 978 (2d Cir.1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 923, 99 S.Ct. 1251, 59 L.Ed.2d 476 (1979). Nabors contends, however, that because Congress amended § 1114 after the offenses committed in Alvarez and Lopez, and the amendments failed to specifically include Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms agents, Congre…