MATTEO

v.

PENNSYLVANIA

Citator

Cited By (17 total)

• United States v. Martino, 648 F.2d 367 (5th Cir. 1981)
  …porting the inference that the crime was committed in the district where the trial is held, direct evidence is not required. United States v. White, 611 F. 2d 531 (5th Cir. 1980); United States v. Turner, 586 F. 2d 395 (5th Cir. 1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 926, 99 S.Ct. 1258, 59 L.Ed.2d 480 (1979). The subject of the mail fraud charged in Count 21 is a sworn Proof of Loss signed by Holt which was mailed by the office of the Safeco Insurance Company in Tampa to the Safeco Insurance Company in Atlanta. Hol…
• United States v. Davis, 666 F.2d 195 (5th Cir. 1982)
  …not be direct proof of venue where circumstantial evidence in the record as a whole supports the inference that the crime was committed in the district where venue was laid.” United States v. Turner, 586 F. 2d 395, 397 (5th Cir. 1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 926, 99 S.Ct. 1258, 59 L.Ed.2d 480 (1979). If the Government shows by a preponderance of the evidence that the crime was committed in the trial district, both territorial jurisdiction and proper venue are established. United States v. Luton, 486 F. 2d a…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Hance v. Zant, 696 F.2d 940 (11th Cir. 1983)
  …e Engel v. Isaac, 456 U.S. 107, 119-21, 102 S.Ct. 1558, 1567-68, 71 L.Ed.2d 783 (1982). The Constitution does not require that venue be proved beyond a reasonable doubt. See United States v. Turner, 586 F. 2d 395, 397 (5th Cir.1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 926, 99 S.Ct. 1258, 59 L.Ed.2d 480 (1979). [*957] Under Georgia law, if the trial court charges the jury generally on the law of reasonable doubt and there is sufficient evidence of venue,15 the court need not specifically charge the jury that proof of…