MORROW
v.
UNITED STATES; COLE V. UNITED STATES; AND CHANDLER V. UNITED STATES

U.S. | 1979-02-21
Nos. 78-6037; No. 78-6064; No. 78-6083
440 U.S. 927 Supreme Court of the United States (1979) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • United States v. Grady James Maner, 611 F.2d 107 (5th Cir. 1980)
    …cate of insurance, testimony by bank cashier that bank operated under certificate on date of record, and no evidence challenging cashier’s testimony of insurance); Eighth Circuit: United States v. Bierey, 588 F. 2d 620 (8th Cir. 1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 927, 99 S.Ct. 1260, 59 L.Ed.2d 482 (1979) (evidence branch bank insured by premium notice and cancelled checks showing entire banking institution insured); United States v. Clemons, 532 F. 2d 122 (8th Cir. 1976) (officer identified certificate, premium…
  • Frank v. Blackburn, 605 F.2d 910 (5th Cir. 1979)
    …fy” or (2) whether the comment was “ ‘of such a character that the jury would naturally and necessarily take it to be a comment on the failure of the accused to testify.’ ” United States v. Chandler, 586 F. 2d 593, 603 (5th Cir. 1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 927, 99 S.Ct. 1262, 59 L.Ed.2d 483 (1979), quoting United States v. Rochan, 563 F. 2d 1246, 1249 (5th Cir. 1977). The court will not presume prosecutorial bad faith. “We cannot find that the prosecutor manifestly intended to comment on the defendant’s…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw