GOUGH, TRUSTEE IN BANKRUPTCY

v.

ROSSMOOR CORP. ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (47 total)

• William Inglis & Sons Baking Co. v. ITT Cont'l Baking Co., Inc., 668 F.2d 1014 (9th Cir. 1981)
  …mstantial evidence, principally of illegal conduct. E. g., CalComp, supra, 613 F. 2d at 736; Sherman v. British Leyland Motors, Ltd., 601 F. 2d 429, 453 n.47 (9th Cir. 1979); Gough v. Rossmoor Corp., 585 F. 2d 381, 390 (9th Cir. 1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 936, 99 S.Ct. 1280, 59 L.Ed.2d 494 (1979); Janich Bros., Inc. v. American Distilling Co., 570 F. 2d 848, 853-54 (9th Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 829, 99 S.Ct. 103, 58 L.Ed.2d 122 (1978). Too heavy a reliance on circumstantial evidence incurs the…
• Lektro-Vend Corp. v. The Vendo Co., 660 F.2d 255 (7th Cir. 1981)
  …y to a competitor. Juneau Square Corp. v. First Wisconsin National Bank, 624 F. 2d 798, 810-11 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1013, 101 S.Ct. 571, 66 L.Ed.2d 472 (1980); Gough v. Rossmoor Corp., 585 F. 2d 381, 386 (9th Cir. 1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 936, 99 S.Ct. 1280, 59 L.Ed.2d 494 (1979). Thus, the fact that the covenants in this case were imposed and enforced, thereby hindering the development of a Vendo competitor, Lektro-Vend, is not enough where the development of Lektro-Vend, was made poss…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• RON Tonkin Gran Turismo, Inc. v. Fiat Distribs., Inc., 637 F.2d 1376 (9th Cir. 1981)
  …ucial to the determination of whether to apply a per se or a rule of reason analysis. The importance of this distinction has been recognized in this circuit as well. We said, in Gough v. Rossmoor Corporation, 585 F. 2d 381 (CA 9 1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 936, 99 S.Ct. 1280, 59 L.Ed.2d 494 (1979), that “In all eases so far holding such restraints to be per se unreasonable, there has been some horizontal concert of action taken against the victims of the restraint. In Mutual Fund Investors v. Putnam Mana…