ARIZONA

v.

CALIFORNIA ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Donald W. Kreuzer, D.M.D. v. Am. Acad. of Periodontology, 735 F.2d 1479 (D.C. Cir. 1984)
  …73, 82 S.Ct. 486, 491, 7 L.Ed.2d 458 (1962), these fundamental principles of civil procedure are equally applicable in antitrust litigation. Proctor v. State Farm Automobile Insurance Co., 561 F. 2d 262, 275 (D.C.Cir.1977), vacated on other grounds, 440 U.S. 942, 99 S.Ct. 1417, 59 L.Ed.2d 631 (1979) (significant evidence substantiating the theory of the complaint must be produced to defeat well supported motion for summary judgment); Merit Motors, Inc. v. Chrysler Corp., 417 F.Supp. 263, 266-67 (D.D.C.1976)…
• Pireno v. NEW York State Chiropractic Ass'n & Union Labor Life Ins. Co., 650 F.2d 387 (2d Cir. 1981)
  …am), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 860, 98 S.Ct. 186, 54 L.Ed.2d 133 (1977); Anderson v. Medical Service, 551 F. 2d 304 (4th Cir. 1977) (mem.); and Proctor v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co., 561 F. 2d 262 (D.C. Cir. 1977), vacated and remanded mem., 440 U.S. 942, 99 S.Ct. 1417, 59 L.Ed.2d 631 (1979). See 440 U.S. at 208-09 n.2, 99 S.Ct. at 1072 n.2. . The structure of the statute supports this analysis. Section 2(b) provides that the antitrust laws “shall be applicable to the business of insurance” to the…
• Proctor v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 675 F.2d 308 (D.C. Cir. 1982)
  …ance Co., Allstate Insurance Co., and Travelers Indemnity Co. — are among the largest automobile insurers in the United States. . 15 U.S.C. § 1012(b)(1976) (hereafter referred to as the McCarran Act). . Proctor v. State Farm Mutual Auto. Ins. Co., 440 U.S. 942, 99 S.Ct. 1417, 59 L.Ed.2d 631 (1979). . Proctor v. State Farm Mutual Auto. Ins. Co., [1980-81] Trade Cases (CCH) H 63,591 (D.D.C. Oct. 12, 1980). In the alternative the court found the vertical agreements legal. Id at 77,-140. . Id (discussing th…

  ← 1 / 3 →