PALMER

v.

TICCIONE ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (17 total)

• Fred v. Sasso, 431 So. 2d 204 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983)
  …of legislation that has as one of its goals the opening of employment opportunities for a younger work force. Perry, supra at 1154-55. Such statutes have uniformly been upheld. See Palmer v. Ticcione, 576 F. 2d 459, 462 (2d Cir.1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 945, 99 S.Ct. 1421, 59 L.Ed.2d 633 (1979); Lamb v. Scripps College, 627 F. 2d 1015, 1021-22 (9th Cir.1980); O’Neil v. Baine, 568 S.W. 2d 761 (Mo.1978). One of the principal objectives of the compulsory-retirement provisions of section 632 of the Forei…
• United States Parole Comm'n v. Geraghty, 445 U.S. 388 (U.S. 1980)
  …ging the validity of the United States Parole Commission’s Parole Release Guidelines, could continue his appeal of a ruling denying class certification even though he had been released from prison while the appeal was pending. We granted certiorari, 440 U. S. 945 (1979), to consider this issue of substantial significance, under Art. Ill of the Constitution, to class-action litigation,1 and to resolve the conflict in approach among the Courts of Appeals.2 [*391] I In 1973, the United States Parole Board adop…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• United States v. Sampol, 636 F.2d 621 (D.C. Cir. 1980)
  …evidence to the jury notwithstanding the defendants’ offer to stipulate the cause of death, for a stipulation would have substantially diluted the force of the proof. See United States v. [*680] Peltier, 585 F. 2d 314 (8th Cir. 1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 945, 99 S.Ct. 1422, 59 L.Ed.2d 634 (1979); United States v. Cockerham, 155 U.S.App.D.C. 97, 476 F. 2d 542 (1973); Hemphill v. United States, 131 U.S.App.D.C. 46, 402 F. 2d 187 (1968). We note that after considering the government’s proffer of evidence…