PENOLI

v.

CALIFORNIA

Citator

Cited By (38 total)

• United States v. Addonizio, 442 U.S. 178 (U.S. 1979)
  …r the case to determine whether Judge Shaw’s sentencing intent had [*184] been frustrated. Proceedings on remand have resulted in the release of both respondents. See Geraghty v. United States Parole Comm’n, 579 F. 2d 238 (CA3 1978), cert. granted, 440 U. S. 945 (1979). See Rodriguez v. United States Parole Comm’n, 594 F. 2d 170 (CA7 1979). See Adams v. United States ex rel. McCann, 317 U. S. 269, 274 (“Of course the writ of habeas corpus should not do service for an appeal. . . . This rule must be strict…
• Deposit Guar. Nat'l Bank of Jackson v. Roper, 445 U.S. 326 (U.S. 1980)
  …further proceedings. Certiorari was sought to review the holdings of the Court of Appeals on both mootness and class certification. We granted the writ, limited to the question of mootness, to resolve conflicting holdings in the Courts of Appeals.4 440 U. S. 945. II We begin by identifying the interests to be considered when questions touching on justiciability are presented in the class-action context. First is the interest of the named plaintiffs: their personal stake in the substantive controversy and…
• United States v. Harrelson, 754 F.2d 1153 (5th Cir. 1985)
  …efined by reference to §§ 1111 and 1112. See, e.g., United States v. Guyon, 717 F. 2d 1536, 1537 (6th Cir.1983), cert. denied, — U.S.—, 104 S.Ct. 1419, 79 L.Ed.2d 744 (1984); United States v. Peltier, 585 F. 2d 314, 318 (8th Cir.1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 945, 99 S.Ct. 1422, 59 L.Ed.2d 634 (1979); United States v. Rivera, 513 F. 2d 519, 521 (2d Cir.1975), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 948, 96 S.Ct. 367, 46 L.Ed.2d 284 (1975); United States v. Hull, 441 F. 2d 308, 309 (7th Cir.1971). Chagra’s own indictment bel…