PRESTON

v.

ESTELLE, CORRECTIONS DIRECTOR

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Howell, 719 F.2d 1258 (5th Cir. 1983)
  …ds the meaning of the words uttered; it is willfully made if the maker voluntarily and intelligently utters the words in an apparent determination to carry out the threat. United States v. Pilkington, 583 F. 2d 746, 747 (5th Cir.1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 948, 99 S.Ct. 1427, 59 L.Ed.2d 637 (1979) (citing Rogers, 488 F. 2d at 514 n. 3). Howell claims that his speech is protected by the first amendment under Brandenburg v. Ohio, 395 U.S. 444, 89 S.Ct. 1827, 23 L.Ed.2d 430 (1969), a case decided soon after…
• United States v. Andrew, 666 F.2d 915 (5th Cir. 1982)
  …vis, 592 F. 2d 1325, 1329 (5th Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 442 U.S. 946, 99 S.Ct. 2894, 61 L.Ed.2d 318 (1979); United States v. Iverson, 588 F. 2d 194, 196 (5th Cir. 1979); United States v. Pilkington, 583 F. 2d 746, 747 (5th Cir. 1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 948, 99 S.Ct. 1427, 59 L.Ed.2d 637 (1978); United States v. Fratus, 530 F. 2d 644, 648 (5th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 846, 97 S.Ct. 130, 50 L.Ed.2d 118 (1976); United States v. Phillips, 519 F. 2d 48, 49 (5th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 423 U.S.…
• United States v. Callahan, 702 F.2d 964 (11th Cir. 1983)
  …he life of the persons named in the statute. United States v. Rogers, 488 F. 2d at 514 & n. 3. The government is not required to prove an actual intent to carry out the threat. United States v. Pilkington, 583 F. 2d 746 (5th Cir.1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 948, 99 S.Ct. 1427, 59 L.Ed.2d 637 (1979), citing United States v. Rogers, 488 F. 2d 512 (5th Cir.1974). [*966] Callahan’s letter is threatening on its face, stating that it is “essential” that the president-elect and vice president-elect be assassinate…