JOSEPH FRANCIS MCDOEL AND WALTER LEE HARDY, APPELLANTS,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
JOSEPH FRANCIS MCDOEL AND WALTER LEE HARDY, APPELLANTS,
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
207 So. 2d 482
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1968)
Negative Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion of the Court
Affirmed. See Ferguson v. State, 157 Fla. 324, 25 So.2d 799 (1946); McDonald v. State, 56 Fla. 74, 47 So. 485 (1908); and Odom v. State, Fla.App.1965, 175 So.2d 202.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Mudarri v. Gillespie, 226 So. 2d 808 (Fla. 1969)…SPECTOR, District Court Judge. We have for review by certiorari a decision of a District Court of Appeal, Mudarri v. Gillespie, 207 So. 2d 482 (Fla.App.3d 1968), which allegedly conflicts with prior decisions of this court and other district courts of appeal on the same point of law. Florida Constitution, Article V, Section 4 (F.S.A.). We must determine whether the rights and remedies pro…
-
Mudarri v. Gillespie, 228 So. 2d 297 (Fla. 3d DCA 1969)…PER CURIAM: Whereas, the judgment of this court was entered on February 27, 1968 (207 So. 2d 482) affirming the order of the Circuit Court for Dade County, Florida, in the above styled cause; and Whereas, on review of this court’s judgment, by certiorari, the Supreme Court of Florida by its opinion and judgment filed September 24, 1969, 226 So…
Authorities Cited
- Angus McDonald v. State, 56 Fla. 74 (Fla. 1908)
- Ferguson v. State, 157 Fla. 324 (Fla. 1946)
- Odom v. State, 175 So. 2d 202 (Fla. 3d DCA 1965)