SECRETARY OF THE NAVY ET AL.

v.

HUFF ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Bailey, 444 U.S. 394 (U.S. 1980)
  …urt of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit reversed the convictions by a divided vote, holding that the District Court had improperly precluded consideration by the respective juries of respondents' tendered evidence. We granted certiorari, 440 U. S. 957, and now reverse the judgments of the Court of Appeals. In reaching our conclusion, we must decide the state of mind necessary for violation of § 751 (a) and the elements that constitute defenses such as duress and necessity. In explaining the reas…
• Brown v. Glines, 444 U.S. 348 (U.S. 1980)
  …erbroad because they might allow commanders to suppress “virtually all controversial written material.” 586 F. 2d, at 681. Such restrictions the court concluded, “exceed anything essential to the government’s interests.” Ibid. We granted certiorari, 440 U. S. 957 (1979), and we now reverse. II In Greer v. Spock, 424 U. S. 828, 840 (1976), Mr. Justice Stewart wrote for the Court that “nothing in the Constitution . . . disables a military commander from acting to avert what he perceives to be a clear danger…
• United States v. Apfelbaum, 445 U.S. 115 (U.S. 1980)
  …i or core of a defendant’s false swearing indictment” it could not be introduced. 584 F. 2d 1264, 1265 (1978). We granted certiorari because of the importance of the issue and because of a difference in approach to it among the.Courts of Appeals.5 440 U. S. 957 (1979). [*120] The differing views that this question has elicited from the Courts of Appeals are not surprising, because there are considered statements in one line of cases from this Court, and both statements and actual holdings in another line o…