CHARLES WINSTON SMITH, APPELLANT,

v.

MARY ANN NORDMAN SMITH, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Graham Contracting, Inc. v. Dep't OF Gen. Servs., 363 So. 2d 810 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978)
  …vided by Chapter 120. To the extent of those remedies, the legislature has waived any claim of state immunity for state action wrongfully depriving citizens of contract rights. This court’s decision in State Road Dept. v. Cone Bros. Contracting Co., 207 So. 2d 489, 491 (Fla. 1st DCA 1968) is not to the contrary. Although the court denied judicial review of the State Road Department’s action on a contract dispute, it did so construing the 1961 Administrative Procedure Act and in circumstances in which the legi…
• Arvida Corp. v. The City OF Sarasota, 213 So. 2d 756 (Fla. 2d DCA 1968)
  …ve Procedure Act, it should be noted, provides guidelines for the conduct of hear [*760] ings before administrative agencies and safeguards for individuals involved in such hearings. State Road Department v. Cone Bros. Contracting Co., Fla.App.1968, 207 So. 2d 489. Part III, on the other hand, provides for judicial review of agency-rules and orders. Why, then, did the legislature provide for the use of the Administrative Procedure Act in the bulkhead statutes ? It is significant initially that under § 120.20…
• VEY v. Bradford Union Guidance Clinic, Inc., 399 So. 2d 1137 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981)
  …extent they are expressly made subject to this act .... The above definition does not in terms encompass a private entity which contractually agrees to provide services for a state agency. In State Road Department v. Cone Brothers Contracting Co., 207 So. 2d 489 (Fla. 1st DCA 1968), the court indicated that a private entity which contracted to provide services for a state agency does not thereby become a state agency itself. Under the terms of the agreement in the present case the Mental Health Center was r…