BROTHERS ET AL.

v.

SCHIMKE ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Malak v. Associated Physicians, Inc., 784 F.2d 277 (7th Cir. 1986)
  …ficiently close nexus with the state because of financial support from the state or state regulation, so that the entity’s conduct or that of its officials is state action. See, e.g., Musso v. Suriano, 586 F. 2d 59 (7th Cir.1978), certiorari denied, 440 U.S. 971, 99 S.Ct. 1534, 59 L.Ed.2d 788. Those cases are simply irrelevant to the instant case since PMH is publicly owned. PMH contends that the district court implicitly decided that the hospital and its Board of Trustees were not liable because plaintiff…
• Daigle v. Opelousas Health Care, Inc., 774 F.2d 1344 (5th Cir. 1985)
  …4, 546 (1982) (emphasis in original). . Id. . Id. at 1004-05, 102 S.Ct. at 2786. . 742 F. 2d 221 (5th Cir.1984). . 436 U.S. 149, 164, 98 S.Ct. 1729, 1737, 56 L.Ed.2d 185 (1978). . Musso v. Suriano, 586 F. 2d 59, 62 (7th Cir.1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 971, 99 S.Ct. 1534, 59 L.Ed.2d 788 (1979). . 457 U.S. 991, 102 S.Ct. 2777, 73 L.Ed.2d 534 (1982). . 457 U.S. 830, 102 S.Ct. 2764, 73 L.Ed.2d 418 (1982).…
• Sound, Inc. v. Am. Tel. & Tel. Co., 631 F.2d 1324 (8th Cir. 1980)
  …Accord, Essential Communications Sys., Inc. v. American Tel. & Tel. Co., 610 F. 2d 1114 (3d Cir. 1979); MCI Communications Corp. v. American Tel. & Tel. Co., 462 F.Supp. 1072 (N.D.Ill.), mandamus denied, 594 F. 2d 594 (7th Cir. 1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 971, 99 S.Ct. 1533, 59 L.Ed.2d 787 (1979); United States v. American Tel. & Tel. Co., 461 F.Supp. 1314 (D.D.C.1978). Since no goals are set forth in the statute that are [*1330] clearly repugnant to the antitrust laws, we must examine the FCC’s exercise…