COOPER

v.

FITZHARRIS

Citator

Cited By (14 total)

• Guice v. Fortenberry, 661 F.2d 496 (5th Cir. 1981)
  …745, 9 L.Ed.2d 770 (1963), to conduct a hearing in certain circumstances, such a hearing is not required unless the petitioner alleges facts that, if proved, would entitle him to the writ. Cronnon v. Alabama, 587 F. 2d 246 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 974, 99 S.Ct. 1542, 59 L.Ed.2d 792 (1978). The facts before the district court must be considered together with the mere charges in the complaint to determine the sufficiency of the charges to warrant relief, The state court record here clearly reveals…
• Birt v. Montgomery, 725 F.2d 587 (11th Cir. 1984)
  …the right to habeas relief.” Id. at 307, 83 S.Ct. at 754. See also Ross v. Hopper, 716 F. 2d 1528, 1534 (11th Cir.1983); Guice v. Fortenberry, 661 F. 2d 496, 503 (5th Cir. 1981) (en banc);6 Cronnon v. Alabama, 587 F. 2d 246 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 974, 99 S.Ct. 1542, 59 L.Ed.2d 792 (1978). In deciding the sufficiency of a request for a hearing, we consider the allegations of the defendant’s habeas petition and supplement the petition with those facts undisputed on the record below. See, e.g., C…
• United States v. Severo D. Espinosa, 771 F.2d 1382 (10th Cir. 1985)
  …nting a finger of guilt at the defendant” was too remote and speculative to constitute a Bruton violation). . See United States v. Bishop, 534 F. 2d 214, 220 (10th Cir.1976); see also Cronnon v. Alabama, 587 F. 2d 246, 251 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 974, 99 S.Ct. 1542, 59 L.Ed.2d 792 (1979); United States v. Barker, 553 F. 2d 1013, 1025 (6th Cir.1977). . Foreman further argues that the prosecutor prejudicially misrepresented the evidence by referring to radio "equipment” found in his vehicle (Tr.…