HUDAK

v.

CURATORS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Goss, 650 F.2d 1336 (5th Cir. 1981)
  …ch Ball Marketing billed Western for the crude. Circumstantial evidence suffices to establish the mailing element of the offense and direct proof of mailing is not required. United States v. Brackenridge, 590 F. 2d 810, 811 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 985, 99 S.Ct. 1801, 60 L.Ed.2d 248 (1979); United States v. Fassoulis, 445 F. 2d 13, 17 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 858, 92 S.Ct. 110, 30 L.Ed.2d 100 (1971); Stevens v. United States, 306 F. 2d 834, 835-36 (5th Cir. 1962). Proof of use of the ma…
• RAY v. Robinson, 640 F.2d 474 (3d Cir. 1981)
  …it is to be of any practical effect to him. This court as well as others has held that an order denying counsel is appealable as a collateral order. See Hudak v. Curators of University of Missouri, 586 F. 2d 105, 106 (8th Cir. 1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 985, 99 S.Ct. 1799, 60 L.Ed.2d 247 (1979); Caston v. Sears, Roebuck Co., 556 F. 2d 1305, 1308 (5th Cir. 1977); Spanos v. Penn Central Transportation Co., 470 F. 2d 806, 807 n.3 (3d Cir. 1972); Miller v. Pleasure, 296 F. 2d 283, 284 (2d Cir. 1961), cert.…
• Slaughter v. City OF Maplewood, 731 F.2d 587 (8th Cir. 1984)
  …, 468, 98 S.Ct. 2454, 2458, 57 L.Ed.2d 351 (1978). As to the “effective unreviewability” of the order, which is disputed here, we find guidance in Hudak v. [*589] Curators of University of Missouri, 586 F. 2d 105, 106 (8th Cir.1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 985, 99 S.Ct. 1799, 60 L.Ed.2d 247 (1979), where the court held immediately appealable a district court’s denial of appointment of counsel to a plaintiff alleging employment discrimination under a variety of federal and state statutes, including Title V…